Why build here?
It would seem Elsenham is shortlisted for one of the new Eco-towns, with up to 15000, yes three zeros, dwellings. Such (over) development will have a devastating effect on the whole area. The stresses on the infrastructure will be enormous. This region
It would seem Elsenham is shortlisted for one of the new Eco-towns, with up to 15000, yes three zeros, dwellings.
Such (over) development will have a devastating effect on the whole area. The stresses on the infrastructure will be enormous. This region is already prone to water shortage, to say nothing of the air quality, background lighting, if Essex allows,
Why this amount of development in the South East? I do not understand the logic of destroying thousands of acres of good arable land when other parts of the country are suffering post (heavy) industrial dereliction.
You may also want to watch:
We should not ignore the potential loss of land to the south east, Essex in particular, as sea levels rise.
Our existing town centres and infrastructure are already at saturation point. For three let alone 10 to 15 thousand dwellings, Uttlesford, indeed East Anglia, is the wrong place.
- 1 Dedicated children's hospital set for Cambridge
- 2 NCTJ staff raise more than £7,000 for journalism bursary
- 3 Minute silence at council meeting for 'kind-hearted' Uttlesford officer
- 4 England call-up for Max Malins after hat-trick in Saracens' demolition of Bath
- 5 Chelmsford bypass 'could provide strategic link' to Stansted Airport
- 6 Fine form continues with seven-up for effervescent Saffron Walden Town
- 7 An afternoon at the Proms for Mountfitchet House residents
- 8 First 'building block' of Harlow town centre major regeneration approved
- 9 David Walliams’ Gangsta Granny coming to Cambridge stage
- 10 Church praises members for 'fantastic' Harvest Time generosity
Why Elsenham? The developers Fairview already 'have control' (whatever that means) of at least one site, from the railway line, up to Henham and down to the Elsenham/Thaxted road. At present this site appears 'landlocked within minor roads, cut off by a second runway and the restrictions of Stansted Village'. These objections disappear when looking at the siting of the proposed new access road to an expanded airport and it becomes obvious how easy it will be to link an enlarged Elsenham to the new M11. The outlook for Uttlesford remaining a rural area is not good.
Colin R Gil, Birdbush Avenue, Saffron Walden