Two Uttlesford home owners fined more than £1,000 each for breaking council planning rules
- Credit: Archant
Two Uttlesford home owners have been fined in court after pleading guilty to separate offences relating to planning control.
Raymond Barry Tyler, of Saffron Walden, and Robert Bunten, of Newport, were each fined more than £1,000 at Chelmsford Magistrates Court on Thursday (February 18) for breaking council planning rules.
Mr Tyler pleaded guilty to providing false information in response to a planning contravention notice for his property in Market Hill, Saffron Walden.
He had stated that the first floor of the property was unoccupied but it was being used for residential purposes without planning permission.
Mr Tyler was fined £550 and ordered to pay a victim surcharge of £55 and costs of £442.55.
You may also want to watch:
In a separate case, Mr Bunten was found guilty of carrying out unauthorised works to a grade II listed building at Buntens Barns, Newport.
Sections of historic wooden tie beams had been removed from the barn when enforcement officers, acting on a complaint, visited the property in July 2015.
- 1 Extension lead warning after fatal fire in Saffron Walden
- 2 New Stansted business park could support more than 3,000 jobs
- 3 Remembrance parade will take place, says town council
- 4 Saffron Walden Town through in FA Vase after dramatic ending
- 5 New solar farm policy 'ducks the main issues', say campaigners
- 6 What is the government's Plan B for Covid this winter?
- 7 Walden fire: Resident has died
- 8 Could we face coronavirus restrictions over Christmas?
- 9 Aviation day out at Audley End for west Essex Scouts groups
- 10 From Star Wars to Cambridge Arts Theatre... Actor Ian McDiarmid talks about The Lemon Table
A planning application for listed building consent was submitted in May 2015 but had been refused by the planning committee on July 20.
The council’s conservation officer stated that the cutting, removal and destruction of the historic tie beams was an irreplaceable loss of the early fabric of the building, and was detrimental to its special architectural and historic interest.
It was also thought that it may affect the stability of the barn.
Mr Bunten said he had taken advice from a structural engineer who told him the building was structurally unsound and the beams needed removing.
He pleaded guilty and was fined £400, ordered to pay a victim surcharge of £40 and costs of £663.35.