Uttlesford: ‘Bedroom tax’ will force some to move - but where to?
NO empty one or two bedroom council homes are currently available in Uttlesford – even though 270 households may be forced to downsize from next month.
Controversial Government plans – labelled a “bedroom tax” by critics – mean some residents will be hit by annual benefit cuts of up to £1,560 after April 1 if they remain in their current home.
The move will affect people who receive housing benefit and have one or more spare rooms.
Uttlesford District Council (UDC) told the Reporter there were currently 212 households with one under-occupied bedroom, and 58 with two empty bedrooms.
On average, claimants will lose £16 a week from their housing benefit if they have one spare room or more. The maximum reduction is £30.
The district council’s cabinet member for housing Cllr Julie Redfern described the shake-up by Westminster as “frustrating” and admitted there was a shortage of one and two bedroom council houses in the district.
But she said the council was doing all it could to address the problem and had been negotiating with developers to include smaller affordable properties as part of planning applications for market housing.
- 1 Man in court over alleged 'fox-killing' during Puckeridge Hunt
- 2 Stansted Airport and Cambridge trains disrupted after tree falls on tracks
- 3 Smoke plume in village near Cambridge thought to be car fire
- 4 Solar farm application decision is deferred
- 5 School activities and sports in pictures
- 6 Delayed Local Plan sparks Uttlesford development fears
- 7 Post Office: change of location in Newport
- 8 Dane's 10 day walk home with only a backpack
- 9 Artists open up in record numbers for Cambridge Open Studios 2022
- 10 A505 long delays between Royston and M11 motorway at Duxford
“The reality is all of us can only rent or buy a property we can afford to live in and that might mean we don’t have as many bedrooms as we would like,” Cllr Redfern explained.
“That is what happens in the private sector and it applies to council tenants too.”
She added: “The number of vacant properties we have available to advertise varies from week to week – two weeks ago there were eight one-bedroom and two two-bedroom flats available but this week there are only two three-bed houses vacant.”
But despite the concerns, Uttlesford Citizens Advice Bureau has praised the district council for its proactive approach.
Everyone affected by the change has been written to and, according to Cllr Redfern, most are prepared to make up for the shortfall rather than downsize.
But others are likely to be caught out.
Social policy manager at the CAB, Kellie Dorrington, also warned that despite assurances from tenants about being able to handle cuts to their housing benefit, many may spiral into financial difficulty.
“Tenants may say they can cope now but a few months down the line they could end up getting into rent arrears and ultimately reach the point where they are evicted from their property,” she said.
“Even if they did wish to downsize at a later date, it might not be a possibility because of the lack of one and two bedroom council houses available in Uttlesford.”